Industry Information

Home > News > Industry Information > Ethylhexyl Triazone vs Benzophenone-3: Which Sunscreen Filter to Use?

Ethylhexyl Triazone vs Benzophenone-3: Which Sunscreen Filter to Use?

Aug. 07, 2025

When developing or reformulating sunscreens, selecting the right UV filter is a decision that impacts not only product efficacy but also regulatory compliance, market positioning, and ecological footprint. Among the widely used filters, Ethylhexyl Triazone and Benzophenone-3 (also known as Oxybenzone) are often compared for their distinct characteristics in sun care formulations.

 

UV filters are designed to protect the skin from harmful UVA and UVB radiation.


Both filters are established in the global market and offer UV protection, but they differ significantly in spectrum coverage, photostability, solubility, safety profile, and regulatory status. Understanding these differences is critical for formulators navigating the evolving landscape of sunscreen development.

 

The Role of UV Filters in Sunscreen Formulations

 

All UV filters are designed to protect the skin from damage caused by UVA and UVB radiation. In this context, benzophenone-3 and Ethylhexyl Triazone serve as organic filters, meaning they absorb UV rays and convert them into heat.

 

However, their absorption profiles are not identical:

 

    Benzophenone-3 provides broad-spectrum protection, primarily in the UVB and short UVA range (approximately 280–350 nm).

 

    Ethylhexyl Triazone offers narrow but very strong UVB absorption (peak at 314 nm), often used to boost SPF values efficiently in low concentrations.

 

Ethylhexyl Triazone Offers High Photostability and Low Use Levels

 

Ethylhexyl Triazone is considered one of the most photostable UVB filters available on the market. It does not degrade easily upon sun exposure, which makes it suitable for long-wear or water-resistant formulations.

 

Key technical advantages:

    Very high molar extinction coefficient, allowing strong protection at low use levels (often below 3%)

    Excellent compatibility with oil phases in emulsions and anhydrous systems

    No significant photodegradation, even when exposed to prolonged UV radiation

 

In combination with other UVA filters (such as Avobenzone), Ethylhexyl Triazone is ideal for building broad-spectrum systems that meet global regulatory and consumer demands for high SPF with lightweight textures.

 

Benzophenone-3 Has Broad UV Coverage but Regulatory and Allergen Concerns

 

Benzophenone-3 remains widely used across many geographies for its dual UVB and UVA-II absorption. It has traditionally been valued for:

    Broad-spectrum protection in a single molecule

    Solubility in both water and oil, enabling versatile formulation options

    Cost-effectiveness for mass-market sun care and hybrid formulations

 

However, in recent years, benzophenone-3 has come under scrutiny:

    The EU limits usage to 6% in most formulations, and 2.2% in aerosol sprays

    Hawaii and some U.S. states have restricted its use due to coral reef toxicity concerns

    It is also listed as a potential allergen, with increasing avoidance among clean beauty brands

 

Because of these factors, many brands now look to Ethylhexyl Triazone as a safer and more photostable alternative.

 

Comparative Technical Summary: Ethylhexyl Triazone vs Benzophenone-3

 

Property

Ethylhexyl Triazone

Benzophenone-3

UV Range

Narrow UVB (280–320 nm)

Broad UVB + UVA-II (280–350 nm)

Peak Absorption

314 nm

~288 nm

Photostability

Very high

Moderate

Typical Use Level

1–3%

2–6%

Solubility

Oil-soluble

Oil- and water-soluble

Global Approval

EU, ASEAN, LATAM

Increasingly restricted

Allergen Risk

Low

Moderate to high

Reef Safety

Considered safe

Under ecological restriction in some regions

 

As can be seen from the table, Ethylhexyl Triazone is more in line with current industry trends in terms of photostability, regulatory adaptability, and formulation flexibility.

 

Choosing the Right Filter Depends on Region, Product Type, and Claim Priorities

 

The selection of sunscreens should not only consider cost or raw material availability, but also the following factors:

    Target sales region: Are there any regulatory restrictions (e.g., Hawaii, the European Union)?

    Packaging and labeling requirements: Are "reef-safe" or "oxybenzone-free" claims required?

    Product form: Is it a water-resistant, oil-based gel, or high-SPF product?

    Synergistic sunscreen system: Is it intended for use with a UVA sunscreen?

 

These practical considerations will determine which ingredient best suits your product positioning and technical goals.

 

Ethylhexyl triazone is a safer, more photostable alternative.


Conclusion

 

As formulation trends move toward transparency, safety, and alignment with evolving global standards, Ethylhexyl Triazone is gaining wider adoption—particularly in high-SPF, photostable sunscreen systems where performance and regulatory confidence are critical.

 

At TJCY, we supply high-purity Ethylhexyl Triazone suitable for global formulations. For brands operating in markets where Benzophenone-3 remains unrestricted, we also offer support for maintaining traditional systems.

 

Whether you're optimizing an existing product or developing a new sunscreen for regional compliance, evaluating your UV filter strategy is a key step toward ensuring both long-term stability and regulatory alignment.


Tianjin Chengyi International Trading Co., Ltd.

8th floor 5th Building of North America N1 Cultural and Creative Area,No. 95 South Sports Road, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

+86 351 828 1248 /

About Us

Tel.: +86 351 828 1246

Fax: +86 351 820 6170

Copyright © Tianjin Chengyi International Trading Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved | Sitemap | Technical Support: Reanod